User talk:Mrsrec

About Me | Talk Page | Sandbox | contribs | Profile

Mrsrec Commented Most Recently

---

Hi Everyone! Want To Know Something Funny? I Was Clicking "Random Page" Over And Over, Desperately Looking For Something To Write. Here Were The Results: 1.Frozen Coco(First Scratch Band) 2.Why Don't My Projects Work Correctly Online? 3.Quiet Please(Second Scratch Band)

Isn't That Funny?
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 18:28, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi buddy!

Hey buddy! I didn't know you were a wiki contributor too! Let's happily frolic through the fields of talk pages and finding things to edit, shall we?
Tierage (talk | contribs) 03:03, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Are We Like Best Friends? Cool! And When It Said, "Tierage Commented Most Recently", I'm Like, TIERAGE HAS A WIKI ACCOUNT?! But Sure, What Do Ya Wanna Edit?
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 03:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

I have no idea. I've been pressing Random Page, but haven't found anything that requires fixing up.
Tierage (talk | contribs) 03:08, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

That's What I Do Too. Isn't It Lame That We Don't Get Messages When Replying?
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 18:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

-two months later- Huh?! He replied?! Oh! Right.
Tierage (talk | contribs) 01:04, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Please discuss before making templates

Use the CP to discuss before creating templates. Also please put templates in Category:Templates. ;)
Mathfreak231 (talk | contribs) 16:40, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

I Don't Like The CP It's Too Crowded
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 16:58, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but it doesn't really matter whether you like it or not; you have to follow the policies of the wiki. :/
veggieman001 (talk | contribs) 07:43, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Who Said You Were In Charge?
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 15:39, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

PS: Literally, Not As An Insult

The wiki likes to handle things democratically and it's been decided reasonable that the CP is a good place to submit template ideas first. He's just telling you the policy the wiki decided upon. I mean, it's not like you're in charge either...
Mathfreak231 (talk | contribs) 20:30, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, You're Right. I'll Start By Talking About The Scratch_Wiki Account I Made On Scratch.
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 23:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Doesn't mean it's official :/
Firedrake969 (talk | contribs) 01:09, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Question

I am a bit confused, why is you revert the image of the inappropriate image.png 2 times? I am wondering because you reverted an admin's edits. Thank you!
KrIsMa user | talk | contribs | edits 04:29, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Please be careful when editing

On revision 80938 of the page User talk:Rumanti, you blanked the page. Although you said it was an accident, please try to avoid that in the future. Also, if something of that nature does happen again, please use the "undo" button to undo your edit of blanking the page rather than just making a post apologizing for it. Thanks!
jvvg (talk | contribs) 15:13, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, I Know THAT, But I Didn't Know How To Revert, So IJust Apoplogized
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 02:40, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

In the future, the revert button is not actually labled 'revert', it is the 'undo' button, in the 'history' section of a page. Just click any 'undo' button, and the revision that the undo button was on, it gets changed to the previous edit! Thanks! log

KrIsMa user | talk | contribs | edits 04:15, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Please remember to sign your posts

It appears that on revision 80692 of the page User talk:Mrsrec, you did not sign your post. Please fix this and remember to sign your posts in the future. Thanks!
Please note that this message was sent by a bot. Please do not remove it or reply to it. If this message was sent incorrectly, please notify my owner, jvvg on his talk page.
WikiMonitor (talk | contribs) 02:39, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Please be careful when mentioning yourself in articles

On revision 80716 of the page Scratch Logo, you added "Scratch Day...On May 15, A Scratch Day Logo Will Be Created By The User Mrsrec." This edit was undone by Turkey3 (talk), stating "That's not really official (if it is show me) and it seems like advertising your name". Before adding your name in that manner to an article, please provide a citation to some document (e.g. a comment or forum post that has been confirmed by an admin). When in doubt, please discuss it on the Community Portal so the rest of the community can advise you. Thank you.
jvvg (talk | contribs) 23:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Please be careful

Your edit, as mentioned above, is against the scratch guidelines of crediting yourself. Also, Your edit to a userpage, revision 80736 violates the userspace rule. The edit summary says, "Normally We Don't Edit Others' Userpages But It Was Confirmed True". If you are doing something that normally breaks Scratch etiquette or guidelines, and have an exception, mention that someone told you to do this edit. In this case, please explain why you edited his/her userpage. Your edit summary was a bit vague, as "confirmed true" is very unclear. Otherwise, your edit will be reverted. Thanks!

KrIsMa user | talk | contribs | edits 04:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

You're Not An Admin, You're My Equal. I Don't Need To Explain Anything To You.

BUT, Because Tierage Is My Friend, I'll Tell You.

Tierage Switched Accounts From Tierage To TierageMain. This Has Been Made Very Obvious So I Did Him A Favor.
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 13:38, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Please be respectful to other users, even if they are not admins. Also, saying "This has been made very obvious" is rather condescending. When doing something that normally breaks Scratch Wiki Etiquette and somebody asks why (even if it's not an admin), you do need to explain why.
jvvg (talk | contribs) 13:43, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Hey mrsrec-- please remember that being a wiki contributor is a privilege and that the wiki is run in a collaborative manner. Everyone makes mistakes while they're editing the wiki, so if someone tells you about something you're doing wrong, it's important to treat them respectfully and learn from them. The wiki works best when everyone works together and tries their best. If you don't think you can do that, maybe the wiki isn't the best place for you.
Scmb1 (talk | contribs) 18:10, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Don't remove peoples' messages on talk pages

I know this is kind of old, but in revision 79071 of Scratch Wiki Talk:Community Portal, you removed Scimonster's message, which said "Such as?" saying "We Don't Remove Messages". It looks like you were removing a message questioning where your topic about new years renovations really had any good examples. Anyway, do not remove peoples' messages on talk pages. This is specifically disallowed in the Scratch Wiki Etiquette. Please follow those rules when making edits in the future.
jvvg (talk | contribs) 13:57, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Re: Deleting user page

I saw your request to have your user page deleted on scmb1's talk page, and I have done so. If you want the contents back, ask mathfreak231, as I don't have the ability to restore deleted pages.
jvvg (talk | contribs) 00:52, 21 January 2014 (UTC) I Want To Rebuild My User Page While Wiping The History, So I Won't Be Needing Somebody To Roll It Back. But Thanks Anyway!
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 02:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Please do not test in the mainspace.

I'm sorry if I ruined some kind of redirect thing you had going, but I moved your page to User:Mrsrec/AprilFools/AFExample. Please do not use the mainspace for testing; only do it in your userspace or at the community sandbox. Thanks.
Mathfreak231 (talk | contribs) 20:04, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

That's Wasn't Testing. It Was An Example I Was Showing To People. Also, Please Don't Move Things Into My Userpage.
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 15:00, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Would you prefer if it was just deleted?
Scimonster (talk | contribs) 16:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

I Don't Need It Anymore. Go Ahead And Delete It With The Reason "Author Request"
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 18:06, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Avoid excessive editing to one page

Between 13:54 and 15:02 (UTC) today, you made 14 edits to the page AprilFools/AFExample. In the Scratch Wiki guidelines, it says 'Try to avoid making a large amount of edits to one page in a short period of time. Use the "Show preview" button to make sure that the page looks how it should and proofread the content before saving.'. Please observe this rule, as it makes patrolling recent changes much harder.

Unfortunately, my bot did not catch this because it is currently having an issue where the whole program crashes if any HTTP requests fail.
jvvg (talk | contribs) 22:37, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

You could use the readystate command to prevent that!!

KrIsMa user | talk | contribs | edits 01:49, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Please remember to sign your posts

It appears that on revision 82751 of the page Scratch Wiki talk:Community Portal, you did not sign your post. Please fix this and remember to sign your posts in the future. Thanks!
Please note that this message was sent by a bot. Please do not remove it or reply to it. If this message was sent incorrectly, please notify my owner, jvvg on his talk page.
WikiMonitor (talk | contribs) 15:06, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

You Are So Useless.
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 15:09, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

No it's not :/ it tells someone if they forget to sign their post, as you did.
Turkey3 (talk | contribs) 15:37, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

It Didn't Say Anything Until I Fixed It. Since I Added NoBots To My Talk Page, I Ain't Gonna Sign This Thing.

Ah, Whatevs.
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 15:54, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Please remember to sign your posts

In revision 82822 of my talk page, you did not sign your post. Please remember to sign your posts in the future.
jvvg (talk | contribs) 17:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

{{NoJvvg}}
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 18:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Please be respectful. If you continue to be disrespectful, I will notify a bureaucrat to take action against you. This is your final warning.
jvvg (talk | contribs) 19:22, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

I Don't Even Understand How That Would Be Disrespectful. Alright, I Clearly Need To Take Impact Here. I'm Gonna Get My Talk Page Protected!
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 20:22, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Do not delete other peoples' talk page messages

On revision 82858 of Scratch Wiki talk:Community Portal, you deleted my message which explained the reasoning behind the message you posted.
jvvg (talk | contribs) 22:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

I Thought I Told You, My Page, My Rules.
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 23:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

It's actually still under the Wiki rules.
Turkey3 (talk | contribs) 23:38, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes, But Mine Too. I'm Gonna Get My Talk Page Protected.
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 23:41, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

That's not allowed, though, because then there is no efficient way to notify you of anything.
Turkey3 (talk | contribs) 23:42, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

I am allowed to notify you whenever I have good reason. As I said I would do in the thread above this one, I have notified a bureaucrat that you are still not respecting other users. If you continue, I will request that your Wiki account be blocked.
jvvg (talk | contribs) 23:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Hey there

I'm just leaving a message here on your talk page saying Hey!
Codeingit (talk | contribs) 15:39, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

---

Thanks for informing me

Thanks for informing me that my Wiki page was out of scope for the Wiki.
NotK3ndricAlt (talk | contribs) 17:43, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Hold on

How is a post from 2013 on the top?
NotK3ndricAlt (talk | contribs) 15:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Because New Threads Go On The Bottom.
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 17:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Small question

Why do you capitalize every word you type? Instead of typing like this, You Type Like This.
Vdiu | Talk | Contributions | Scratch Profile 08:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Sometimes I Type Like This, but other times I type like this.
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 04:03, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Consensus on Date Formatting

Hello! I'm not sure if we have reached a consensus here for dates inside articles yet. Would you mind if you explain? Thanks!
Purin2022 | 💬Talk | 📝Contribs | 🐱Scratch 14:51, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

My understanding is that the ongoing discussion is waiting on written-out formats. While the discussion started on titles; to me, it is common sense that there is no need to use one format in titles and a different format in contents. But if there is controversy about it, I will stop changing them for now.
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 17:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

My understanding of the entire discussion is that it's all about article titles and written out dates, and not dates in references.
Purin2022 | 💬Talk | 📝Contribs | 🐱Scratch 18:18, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Regarding ST Page

It is true that the ST owns many, many accounts, but we don't only list them if they have the Scratch Team status. There are multiple accounts on the current members page that do not have the ST status, but are still confirmed to be members in other ways. This shouldn't be any different for ilovefrogs3, which is a Scratch Team ran account that doesn't have the status - if I heard about any other accounts, I would add them too
han614698 talk • contribs (2,568) • profile 18:01, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

@han614698 For individual Scratch Team members, it's mirrored from the Credits page. That section was created to list accounts with the Scratch Team rank that *aren't* on the credits page. I personally don't really see a use in documenting ilovefrogs3, because there are a bunch of accounts that have appeared somewhere by the Scratch Team. The same reason why ScratchCat is listed, but all of the other mascot accounts aren't listed, even though they are controlled by the Scratch Team. Even only "front-facing" accounts like ScratchDesignStudio are semi-useful, but just a list of accounts that have been used is a bit of a stretch-- plus, the list wouldn't be more "trivia" than useful, and the Scratch Team page probably isn't the place for that.
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 21:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

@Mrsrec—The difference between accounts like ScratchGnat and ilovefrogs3 is that ScratchGnat is just owned by ceebee (as said in their WIWO) - ilovefrogs3 is obviously a test account with separate permissions in the backend, even if they don't have the public ST rank, it's obviously more of an ST account - we don't include accounts like eebeec or mres (vs. mres-admin). If we find a source that someone is an ST member, even if they're not on the credits page, we would add them to the ST page. ilovefrogs3 is at the very least owned and used by the ST as a test account, unlike ScratchGnat which is just owned by an ST member. Also, I do believe that trivia should be included on the page, in my opinion. (yes I know that's redundant)
han614698 talk • contribs (2,568) • profile 21:35, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

@han614698 OK, but that's for *people* who are identified by their usernames. This is for a list of role accounts with the Scratch Team rank; those that are used to represent the Scratch Team. Like I said, the amount of accounts that theoretically have been used for something is a mile long. Is there any utility in it, over, say ScratchDesignStudio? Alternatively, is there any evidence that it has any special permissions on scratch.mit.edu? It seems to just be a normal account to me; it could also be an account on scratch.ly.
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 16:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

@Mrsrec—The account obviously has some sort of extra permissions considering they took screenshots of the studio update before it was released. I actually think that ScratchDesignStudio should be listed on this page, but we don't even have proof it's an ST account - it has the Scratcher rank, and apart from creating the SDS studio has no different powers than a regular user. ilovefrogs3 obviously had some sort of extra server perms than a regular user.
han614698 talk • contribs (2,568) • profile 17:46, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

OK, I think I see what the confusion is here. Taking pictures of the studio update before it was released doesn't necessarily mean that account has elevated permissions. The most likely thing was that those pictures were taken on https://scratch.ly -- this is basically a copy of the Scratch website that they can use to test out updates before they go onto the Scratch site. They can also change who sees what at the CDN level-- based on things like IP address or cookies, not things that are tied to your user account. You can even make your own copy if you want, for example, Jeffalo, who is just a normal user on Scratch, took some screenshots of the studio update more than 2 months before it was released-- but that's not because his account has some special permissions (it doesn't)-- it's just the way software works.
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 20:37, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Ok. I would like another users opinion, but, at the very least, it’s ran by the ST.
han614698 talk • contribs (2,568) • profile 01:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Bump, @Mrsrec how could we continue this conversation since I still agree with my former opinion.
han614698 talk • contribs (2,568) • profile 00:49, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Isn't it already continued on the community portal?
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 09:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Not as far as I can tell.
han614698 talk • contribs (2,568) • profile 10:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Scratch 4.0 Revisions

I agree that the wiki should definitely be updated to reflect what cheddargirl said to me, but I'm not sure that drastically redirecting to List of Misconceptions is necessary. I think, since this is a fairly big thing in the community, it's important to leave a 4.0 page with information on how there IS a major update coming, and how it MAY come with a renumber to 4.0 or MAY just be a 3.0 feature. Thoughts?
han614698 talk • contribs (2,568) • profile 03:10, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

My initial thoughts were almost exactly that, verbatim, but someone pointed out this to me and it made me change my mind. In that case, sources appeared to support information that sources did not actually support, and the ST were upset about its inclusion. Plus, it is not yet known if it is major. That is why I redirected the page. You can always put it back if you want, the S:BRD process is there for that
Mrsrec (talk | contribs) 13:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)