2.0 Style?

How about making it:

Removed - Outdated


Removed - Outdated

and perhaps you should add an image, here are a two we could add: Clock.pngArchive.png

The code I'm using for this is:

{{Header Template |1= |2=This page documents a feature not included in the current version of Scratch ([[Scratch 2.0|2.0]]). It is only useful from a historical perspective. {{#if:{{{1|}}}|For information on the feature that replaced this one, see [[{{{1}}}]].}}}}

Sorry if I should of just gone and done this, I just felt it would be quite a big change to a well-used template.
EH7meow (talk | contribs) 20:11, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Holy pretzels it looks great!!! I don't know if you should change it though: I don't think any other templates are 2.0 style yet and it would be inconsistent:(
Scratchisthebest (talk | contribs) 20:13, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
This is actually a good idea! I like how it looks both neater and much more similar to 2.0; and so I think it should be implemented both here and on the other templates (for consistency).
ErnieParke (talk | contribs) 20:49, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Most other header templates are 2.0 style. I was really wondering if there was a reason this one wasn't. Do you think we should have a picture?
EH7meow (talk | contribs) 09:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Do you think I could just go and make the change?
EH7meow (talk | contribs) 17:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
I would say yes, you should do ahead with the change. As for a picture, I think that it would be a nice touch if we can find a good one to go in the template. Maybe a typewriter would fit? What do you think?
ErnieParke (talk | contribs) 17:36, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, I was thinking something like a castle to indicate it's old. i'll have a look for images.
EH7meow (talk | contribs) 17:40, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
I've updated to 2.0 style now.
Recently curiouscrab added {{#ifexist:Scratch 2.1|{{error|this template is outdated. Please fix it soon.}} to this template, do you know how to add it back?
EH7meow (talk | contribs) 17:48, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
By looking at the history, yes I do. I just added the error back, if you want to look at the code I've added.
ErnieParke (talk | contribs) 18:05, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Scratch 3

When scratch 3 comes out we have to change the current version in the template.
Jakel181 (talk | contribs) 00:02, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

You're behind the times! Scratch Wiki:3.0 Articles/Template:Obsolete feature
Kenny2scratch logo.jpg kenny2scratch  Talk  Contribs  Directory 
03:49, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Lol I was going to create that, but then I thought it was too small of an edit to be worthy of a new page. :)
Jakel181 (talk | contribs) 00:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)


When a page has this template, it gets put in the articles about the past category, even if just a section has it. If an article is about a current feature but has this template in a section, it will still get the category. Is there any way to fix that?
derpmeup (talk | contribs) 19:56, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Is that so bad?
If you think it's important enough, we could add a parameter to specify if it's a section.
Scimonster (talk | contribs) 17:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Well, I don't know, but it specifies that the whole article is about he past when only a section is.
derpmeup (talk | contribs) 17:30, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.