What's with the 1.4-ish blocks?
Because the article is about a category in Scratch 2.0, shouldn't the images show the blocks as they appear in 2.0? 
Mathfreak231 (talk | contribs) Updated 21:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- We just don't have the 2.0 images yet (I'll get some at some point in the next week or two.
veggieman001 (talk | contribs) 23:55, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
What's with the images of blocks to the right?
What is the purpose of the block images on the right when there are duplicates written in scratchblocks within the main body of the article? Doesn't it just waste space?
_Tigerjack_(talk | contribs) 01:42, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Update to Scratch 3.0
Is an update required now?
Makethebrainhappy (talk | contribs) 00:17, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
"Variables blocks"???
Wouldn't it be "Variable Blocks"? Variables blocks isn't grammatically correct
Dominic305 Talk Contribs (1,791) Scratch Directory 18:44, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- It isn't "Variable Blocks" because the name of the category is variables and not variable. This is how it is done with stuff like Looks Blocks, Operators Blocks, etc...
Naleksuh (talk | contribs) 18:56, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, I thought they were "Operator Blocks and stuff. Never mind then.
Done Dominic305 Talk Contribs (1,791) Scratch Directory 20:42, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, I thought they were "Operator Blocks and stuff. Never mind then.
