reportVar is not working for me. Is anyone sure it isn't readVar?
ProgrammingFreak (talk | contribs) 22:03, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

It might be...
Scimonster (talk | contribs) 20:27, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Forum stuff

Someone on the forum pointed out (maybe) an error, when it says t1 _ (1 = 0) "t1 contains the value true" t2 _ (1 = 1) "t2 contains the value false" Is that an error, or the correct stuff?
Technoboy10 (talk | contribs) 18:37, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Oops, my bad. Fixed. :P
Hardmath123 (talk | contribs) 05:27, 4 April 2012 (UTC)


Wow! I just popped in to see what happened to this tutorial and it's seriously evolved from the first version I submitted! Great work, everyone who added to this! It's good that the language used is remaining concise - easy to understand - or explained!
Sparks (talk | contribs) 15:36, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Hardmath123 did most of the info. :)
Scimonster (talk | contribs) 15:54, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks sparks, it feels great knowing someone like you thinks it's better. :)
Hardmath123 (talk | contribs) 16:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Hey we have a problem......

Googling "Squeak Wiki" can bring up this page. It's just luck I have an account and can tell you this before MIT gets in a legal mess again.
Krett12 (talk | contribs) 15:12, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

How is that illegal? We aren't pretending to be officially sponsored by Squeak, and this is just a result of google indexing.
jvvg (talk | contribs) 15:22, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Neither was this, but it got taken down anyway.
Krett12 (talk | contribs) 15:05, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Scratch Wiki, we have a problem.

– Me and a spaceman

SSSLogo.png SuperSmashScratch (talk | contribs) 15:08, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Yes, but no!
Krett12 (talk | contribs) 15:10, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
I don't get it. All I was doing was making a joke about the "Houston, we have a problem" quote.
SSSLogo.png SuperSmashScratch (talk | contribs) 15:13, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Actually, that project was mimicing Pac-Man, thus violating the trademark. However, we are just providing information related to the usage of Squeak, and as such are not violating any trademarks. If Squeak were trademarked (I'm not sure if it is), violating it would require us actually calling this the Squeak Wiki.
jvvg (talk | contribs) 19:17, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, having an informational page about something won't get you into a legal/trademark issue. If that were true, Wikipedia would probably have been sued over 10000 times by now. ;)
derpmeup (talk | contribs) 19:19, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Krett12 (talk | contribs) 19:27, 11 October 2014 (UTC)


When I removed some sections that was not vandalism (well, it was). I wanted to see if anyone paid attention to minor edits. Forgot about byte-checker. I removed my "vandalism". :)
Krett12 (talk | contribs) 15:18, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

No longer recent

This page says "Recently there has been an influx of users"...
It's not recent anymore. This should probably be updated.
Jonathan50 (talk | contribs) 05:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.