Isn't it 120?

Isn't it 120 seconds for New Scratchers? Here's a screenshot I took on a testing New Scratcher account:
Tierage (talk | contribs) 17:50, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

It probably is in that case. Also, when making a new section please always make sure they are at the bottom of the page in future.
EH7meow (talk | contribs) 18:22, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Broken link

The external link in the footnote doesn't work. —Brian Harvey (talk) 19:21, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

I removed the reference, it's not needed anyway. :)
WeirdF (talk | contribs)

Correct wording of sixty-second rule

360-International made an edit to the article as seen here which I think might be worthy of discussion. I think this article's title is correct, but the question is, how do we reference the sixty second rule within the article? There's a couple options that I see could be possible:

  1. sixty-second rule
  2. Sixty-Second Rule
  3. sixty second rule
  4. Sixty Second Rule
  5. 60-second rule
  6. 60-Second Rule
  7. 60 second rule
  8. 60 Second Rule

I think the first option is the best since it is the one used in the article title, and as it is also lowercased since the rule is more of an informal term used by Scratchers who post a lot, and not a significant rule like the "Fifth Amendment" (which is capitalized in the middle of a sentence). But what are your thoughts? Maybe it should be capitalized? Or should one of the other choices be used?
Lucario621 (talk | contribs) 23:22, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

I agree with Lucario, the first one looks the best and is also grammatically sound.
Veggieman001 (talk | contribs) 23:31, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
+1, the first.
Scimonster (talk | contribs) 04:18, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
OK, since everybody agrees, I'll make the changes to the article now... Yes Done
Lucario621 (talk | contribs) 20:17, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.