Summarize

This article is way too long and needs to be condensed. Once that and a few other errors are fixed, it should be presentable again.
TenType (talk | contribs) 01:15, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

I'll test removing a tag before the content that "disappeared". I hope that helps.
God286 (talk | contribs) 05:29, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
*gasp* I FIXED IT!
God286 (talk | contribs) 05:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
...it was supposed to be purposely hidden.
TenType (talk | contribs) 23:38, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, I think we need to reverse it.
God286 (talk | contribs) 20:44, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
@God286 It was purposely hidden because it was hardly presentable, yet not deleted so it could be improved.
Jakel181 (talk | contribs) 21:02, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Doesn't work

I tested the unencrypted saving and loading mechanism (I will post my findings if I can find a place to host them) and it doesn't work. It works for the first 4 items in the save code, but everything after that breaks. The problem is that it goes until it sees a semicolon. This makes the correct save code

define save (data)
set [code v] to (join (join (code) [;]) (join (data) [;]


Dhuls's Wiki Icon.png Dhuls (Talk|922 Contributions|Scratch) 19:40, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

I tested both the original code and your modified version, and yours does in fact work properly, while the one in the article does not. I've gone ahead and edited the article to change the code, so it should now work properly. If I was mistaken, others can change it as they see fit.
Scratch137 (talk | contribs) 09:06, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Encryption system concerns

The section "Encrypting Save Codes" details a method of "encrypting" the encoded variable so it is harder to exploit. However, the code in this section doesn't seem very useful; it simply multiplies all of the data by 43653, then divides it by the same number when decoding.

define save (data)
set [code v] to (join(join (code) [; ]) ((data) * [43653]))

This system is just as consistent and predictable as the regular method, and therefore just as insecure. I feel like this should probably be made more secure or just removed entirely, as it doesn't serve much purpose in its current state.
Scratch137 (talk | contribs) 09:14, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Bug in this method

Save "The;glitch" and decode. Result = 1 entry is 2 entries
PenguinLover1123 (talk | contribs) 21:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.