What exactly needs to be added? I think it looks fine.
PrincessFlowerTV (talk | contribs) 23:37, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- It is copied from real privacy policy.
Apple502j Talk/Activities 2,243edit 00:13, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
Third person?
Does this need to be in the third person? There are a lot of "you's" and "we's".
20audreyw (talk | contribs) 21:08, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- This is a copy of the real one.Disagree? Apple502j Talk/Activities 2,243edit 23:26, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
What's the point?
What is the purpose of this page if it's just a copy of the Scratch Privacy Policy? Also, whether or not we keep it, we need to update it to the most recent Privacy Policy.
Groko13 (talk | contribs) 02:50, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
New image + improving this page
We need a new image for the updated Scratch Privacy Policy, but I don't know how to compress images; could someone else upload an updated image?
Also, how should we proceed with improving this page? Personally, I think we should add our own explanation to each chunk of the Privacy Policy, but that could make the article unnecessarily long and confusing. Alternatively, we could remove the actual Privacy Policy and replace it with our own explanation of all of the major points, which would forgo some accuracy but improve understandability. Groko13 (talk | contribs) 23:22, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- You can compress images with TinyPNG.
- I personally want the article short and sweet, plus don't like the fact that the Privacy Policy is just copied from the Scratch website. I think we should summarize the policy sections in our own words.
TenType (talk | contribs) 23:55, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- Perhaps we could follow the format of the Terms of Use article. In that article, each section is just summarized in a few sentences. Groko13 (talk | contribs) 04:30, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Great idea! We should get started with this plan. TenType (talk | contribs) 07:25, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Great! One more thing: should we keep the first/second person format used in the actual Privacy Policy? The Editing Conventions would normally disallow it, but I think that an exception could be made as it is paraphrasing the actual Privacy Policy, and it is in question/answer format. I think we should keep the format because it would preserve the section headings and make it easier to compare to the actual policy; also, the Terms of Use article uses 2nd person. I'll start it with 1st/2nd person, and we can remove it later if we choose. Groko13 (talk | contribs) 15:10, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Great! One more thing: should we keep the first/second person format used in the actual Privacy Policy? The Editing Conventions would normally disallow it, but I think that an exception could be made as it is paraphrasing the actual Privacy Policy, and it is in question/answer format. I think we should keep the format because it would preserve the section headings and make it easier to compare to the actual policy; also, the Terms of Use article uses 2nd person. I'll start it with 1st/2nd person, and we can remove it later if we choose.
- Great idea! We should get started with this plan.
- Perhaps we could follow the format of the Terms of Use article. In that article, each section is just summarized in a few sentences.
2nd person, except for headers. They can stay the same. TenType (talk | contribs) 20:31, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, should we keep the first person in the paragraphs (like the ones that say "we" referring to the Scratch Team?) Groko13 (talk | contribs) 20:49, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Questions
Should we remove the "not useful" template now, since the article is no longer just a summary of the Privacy Policy (with an introductory paragraph and some summarized sections)? Also, should we keep the commented sections in for reference (though they make the source longer)? Groko13 (talk | contribs) 21:23, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
