Talk:Indirect Start

is this really a required article?

some of it seems pretty opinionated
Mathfreak231 (talk | contribs) 14:18, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

There's no official way to begin a project. Some may just be a still image with no scripts. For that I'm with you.
Turkey3 (talk | contribs) 15:42, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

I think the article contains some good advice, the:

when gf clicked
broadcast [start v]

when I receive [start v]
. . .

is actually a good way to allow projects to re-started. I think a good decision would be to move it to "Ways to Start a Project" or something like that, remove the bias and make it more like a How-To.
EH7meow (talk | contribs) 16:13, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

I was also thinking along those same lines; the title needs to be changed, and touch up's applied. The article I'm fine with though because as EH7Meow pointed out, it has an important concept in it that I've used many times before.

I do feel that this might not deserve an entire article though, so I was thinking maybe it could become a sub-category under the [when I receive [ v]] block. Thoughts on that?
ErnieParke (talk | contribs) 00:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)