Boolean Stuff
Can someone please write a section about the boolean stuff itself? I tried and it didn't go well... :S 
Chrischb (talk | contribs) 10:01, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Hmm
I'm not so sure, hmm. 
Krett12 (talk | contribs) 03:53, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- what does this have to do with booleans?
Mrrecordman (talk | contribs) 19:59, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
How to Add Section with Block Plugin?
I am trying to add the following to the end of section 'Other Uses', subsection 'Direct Comparison':
"If one requires them both to have a certain input, one can use
<> and <>
block if both conditions should be true, and
<not <> and not <>>
if both conditions should be false."
As you can see, I am having trouble with the second script. I have two questions.
1. Is this okay or would it be unnecessary clutter? 2. If it's okay, how do I get the second block working?
Thanks in advance!
Queer_Royalty (talk | contribs) 02:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- The second script should be this:
<<not <>> and <not <>>>(you need extra chevrons around the "not" blocks). In my opinion that would be clutter, since that's basically just restating the definition of the "and" block.
jvvg (talk | contribs) 03:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- i think that block is utterly unecessary. the workaround is too easy. so i would say it is clutter. workaround:
<<not <>> and <not <>>> Mrrecordman (talk | contribs) 19:57, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- i think that block is utterly unecessary. the workaround is too easy. so i would say it is clutter. workaround:
