Talk:Argument

Rename?

I think Argument is too generic of a name. I think it should say like "Conditional Arguments", "Block Inputs", "Block Arguments", "Block Conditions", or something along those lines.
Dazman (talk | contribs) 19:14, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Adding another word would be a sign of multiple argument types - saying "Conditional Arguments" would indicate that there are more types of arguments. :/

I think it's fine as it is :)

(BTW, when I saw "Talk:Argument" in RecentChanges, I panicked - lol xD)
Jonathanpb (talk | contribs) 05:36, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Me too. But there should be redirects.
Scimonster (talk | contribs) 11:30, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Lol I agree with scimonster.
Dazman (talk | contribs) 13:50, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

I did it. :)
Scimonster (talk | contribs) 13:58, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

List types

I'd appreciate it if someone could add what types of arguments each letter is.
Scimonster (talk | contribs) 13:29, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

The redirect template

By then, we already have 3 items. Perhaps it should be a disambig?
Scimonster (talk | contribs) 07:12, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

I think it's fine. A lot of people call it an insert in Scratch, and more people would want this than the other two things. There doesn't have to be a disambig for everything with more than two meanings, but if there arise even more meanings, a disambig with redirect priority to this page would be nice. :P
Mathfreak231 (talk | contribs) Updated 14:42, 7 July 2013 (UTC)