Wouldn't this workaround only work with numbers, not with strings?
SJRCS_011 (talk | contribs)01:33, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Hmm I just tested it with strings, and it seems to work with them too :P
Chrischb (talk | contribs) 04:39, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Aren't strings read as 0 when it comes to numbers? *goes to check* Well, they are read as numbers if you use (_+_). Well, it does work.......That's weird, becuase how do you find out if a word is greater than another? Whatever. At least it works. (If anyone could explain that would be nice)
SJRCS_011 (talk | contribs)02:30, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
When strings are compared they are ranked alphabetically. Numbers are ranked higher than strings. For example: b>a 1>a car>bat fat>far 3b>3a
Bsteward (talk | contribs) 03:41, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
numeric types have higher precedence than strings, and when comparing strings, b has higher precedence than a, c greater precedence than b and a, and so on. When adding the correlating numeric value of a letter to another to obtain a word, that will provide you with the outcome numeric value of that particular word, or string.
XenoK_Studios (talk | contribs)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.