Document.png This article or section needs additional citations for verification. Its information may not be accurate. Editors can help by adding references. (December 2013)

Below is a list of misconceptions about Scratch. Oftentimes, people will misunderstand a concept about Scratch or misinterpret a feature's function. The following misconceptions are categorized by type.

Scratch Program

DocumentInQuestion.png This section is in question as to whether it is useful or not. You can discuss whether you think it should be deleted or not on its talk page. (September 2020)
Reason: Most are common sense or not notable

The Scratch program has multiple misconceptions on scripting and other features. These misconceptions are found among the Scratch program.


The if () then block does not repeatedly check a condition. If this was the case, it would not have a joiner on the bottom. In order for it to repeatedly check a condition, it must be within a forever loop, as in the following script:[1][2][3][4]

when green flag clicked
if<. . . :: grey> then
. . .
  • Broadcasts are also received by clones, which can cause some coding problems. However, it is possible to use the "delete clone" block to prevent clones from receiving it.[5]
  • Boolean sensors passed into custom blocks cannot update the parameter's value while the custom block is running. Boolean sensors only pass in true or false.[5]
  • The tempo blocks only change the duration of notes and not the imported sound.[6]


It is common to do the following as an alternative to the timer:[citation needed]

when gf clicked
set [timer v] to [0]
wait (1) seconds
change [timer v] by (1)

It appears to be accurate to the actual change of time, but after each block is a very minuscule wait. Therefore, after the blocks waits the specified number of seconds, there is another wait (one frame) before the timer changes. In a short period of time, the change is not too drastic, but if the variable timer continues this loop for a long period of time, the ratio of difference compared to the actual (timer) will be visible; just over 7% off by 100 seconds, and 62.3% off by 600 seconds.[7][clarify]

In order to reduce the delay, you must wait 0 seconds.[8] It will cause a pause of 1 frame (1/30 seconds). This allows it to be much more accurate, and loses less than 0.1 seconds in 100 seconds.

when gf clicked
set [timer v] to [0]
wait (0) secs
change [timer v] by ((1) / (30))

Another common misconception is that

 set x to ()
set y to ()

is the same as

 go to x: () y:() 

But it turns out that Scratch runs the first block, then the second, separately. If using a pen extension, it would not draw diagonal lines sensibly, instead, draw horizontal and vertical lines. If not using pen, it can be a workaround and is not a misconception.


Many Scratchers tend to believe that Scratch is specifically designed for making games, but this is false. Although games can be made in Scratch, a large variety of project genres are creatable including art, animations, music and stories, or even some "tools" and "simulations". There can even be a miscellaneous project genre. Rather than one stating that Scratch is used to make games, it would be more accurate to state that Scratch is used to design web-based projects.[5]

Disappearing Text Bug

Main article: Disappearing Text Bug
The Disappearing Text Bug

The Disappearing Text Bug was not introduced in Scratch 1.3. It was first encountered in 1.3, but it was also later reported by users using older versions (e.g. Scratch 1.0.1), thereby falsifying this myth.

Scratch Website

This is for misconceptions about the website.

Main Site

  • The old 1.4 and 2.0 beta site are no longer accessible, the former of which was deleted and the latter was updated to become the current Website.
  • "Weekend" is the oldest existing project, even though its shared time is 15 years later than that of "Sandwhich[sic]". The shared time only reflects the most recent sharing; "Weekend" was first shared on 5 March 2007,[9] and earlier than the 21 other existing projects shared that day.


  • The old 1.4 forum can still be previewed, as can other parts of the site. However, the previewer cannot jump between threads. (See the first misconception in the above list.)
  • The Report button is not only useful for reporting inappropriate material. It has other uses, too. For instance, moving forum topics when they are not in the right one is done by reporting.
  • Deleted posts and threads wind up in the Dustbin, rather than being literally deleted. This one is common among people unfamiliar with what Community Moderators and Scratch Team members do on Scratch.
  • Blockspam is spam only if the script is long, nonsensical, and off-topic. Using the block plugin to display on-topic messages is not spam.[10][11][12]

Other Places on The Site

ScratchR is often confused with "Scratcher", "Scratch Team member", or even "Scratch Resources". [citation needed]



Main article: Kaj#Misconceptions, Impersonations, and Conspiracies
  • It is unknown whether Kaj was female, as is commonly portrayed, though one contact with the Scratch Team used male terms.
  • Kaj did not hack or steal any accounts, as is commonly alleged.


Many people thought gobo was a regular user, fake/joke account, or was controlled by Gobo[citation needed], but it is actually real and controlled by the Scratch Team, despite the rank saying "Scratcher".[13]


Main article: gdpr0000001

gdpr0000001 is commonly believed to be the first account created on Scratch due to its join date, but the first user was actually wrgsfhwbxvb who was created earlier in real time, without having their join date altered.[14] andresmh, who created the site, is the oldest user who has not been deleted.[15]

It is also commonly believed a test account,[16][17] even by a Scratch Team member,[18] however it is just as likely that the account belonged to a regular user who wanted their data deleted under the General Data Protection Regulation act.


Alongside gdpr0000001, ScratchCat is also believed to be the first account created on Scratch that still exists[19], due to its join date being the same as andresmh. However, its ID is much greater than that of andresmh[15][20], indicating that it was likely created many years later.

Scratch 4.0

It is commonly believed that Scratch 4.0 will come out in 2025 due to evenly spaced amount of time between the previous updates. The Scratch Team, however, is not planning on making Scratch 4.0, and the “evenly spaced” time between is just a coincidence. As of May 2023, there are no plans to release Scratch 4.0. However, further improvements are still planned for Scratch 3.0.[21][22][23]

False Reporting

Main article: What happens if a project is false reported?

A number of users believe that if a project is reported by a certain number of users, whether or not something was actually wrong with it, this will lead to the creator being permanently banned or banned for a significant period of time.[24][25][26] However, all reports are reviewed by the Scratch Team, and if a project is taken down and the creator banned because a certain number of people reported the project, these effects only last until the Scratch Team reviews the reports, after which they will remove the ban and re-share the project if there was nothing wrong with it.[27] Additionally, intentionally reporting something when there is nothing wrong with it is a violation of the Community Guidelines and will result in consequences.[28]

Changing Usernames

It is commonly believed that it is impossible to a username to be changed through any means. However, on very rare occasions (such as if the username has private information, inappropriate content, or causes gender dysphoria), the Scratch Team has allowed username changes. [29]


  1. post:12106
  2. post:2166518
  3. post:3161451
  4. post:3465928
  5. a b c d topic:67468
  6. topic:77102
  7. projects:10941655
  8. projects:114798177
  10. Za-Chary. (13/06/2020). "Small uses of scripts is okay for us — but long and laggy scripts in a place where it doesn't belong might not be." post:4123141
  11. Paddle2See. (15/06/2020). "If you find that somebody has put a bunch of blocks in their post that do not contribute to the conversation, that is off-topic or spamming... However, if they are using the blocks as a way to format what they are saying, that is not blockspam and should not be reported." post:4127402
  12. Za-Chary. (07/05/2020). "...'blockspam' is okay if the scripts are short and are related to the topic at hand." post:3993497
  13. users:Paddle2See/#comments-16325124[dead link]
  14. "{"id":1"
  15. a b "{"id":139"
  16. post:4302389
  17. post:3835303
  18. users:Za-Chary/#comments-95466725[dead link]
  19. topic:520601
  20. "{"id":15883188"
  21. Paddle2See. (07/02/2023). "As far as I know, no plans have been announced for a version 4 yet." post:6963648
  22. cheddargirl. (14/02/2023). "Revisions to Scratch are based on how the software is updated. We're not due to a major revision that would justify naming it 4.0 anytime soon, especially since 3.0 is fairly recent and stable. " post:6981709
  23. Paddle2See. (13/06/2023). "I have not seen any roadmap for Scratch that implies that version 4.0 will be out this year [2023] or any time soon." post:7309641
  24. topic:141100
  25. topic:408356
  26. topic:450880
  27. post:4670186
  28. post:2732908
  29. Sliverus. (05/06/23). "But in some cases, such as if it contains personal information, inappropriate content, or it does not identify with your current gender, you may use Contact Us and ask for it to be changed.topic:682791"
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.